Analysis of Consumer Decisions in Using Sharia-Based Digital Payment Services (Sharia E-Wallet)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/p190r625Keywords:
Sharia E-Wallet, Islamic Fintech, Consumer Behavior, Digital Payment Services, Sharia ComplianceAbstract
This research explores the factors influencing consumer decisions in adopting Sharia-based digital payment services (Sharia e-wallets), a growing segment within the Islamic financial technology (fintech) sector. Amid the increasing digitization of financial services, understanding how Islamic values intersect with consumer behavior is crucial. Using a mixed-method approach, this study combines quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews with Muslim consumers to identify key drivers and barriers in the adoption of Sharia-compliant e-wallets. The results show that religious commitment, perceived trust, usability, and Sharia legitimacy significantly impact consumer choices. Conversely, limited awareness, lack of differentiation from conventional services, and perceived complexity hinder broader acceptance. The study offers practical implications for fintech developers, marketers, and policymakers in promoting inclusive, ethical, and faith-aligned digital financial solutions. Ultimately, this research contributes to the academic discourse on Islamic consumer behavior in the digital economy and supports the advancement of Sharia-based financial innovations.References
Adas, E. B. (2006). The making of entrepreneurial Islam and the Islamic spirit of capitalism. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(02), 113–137.
Ahmed, N., Rasheed, K., & Talha, M. (2019). Islamic banking perspective on shariah compliant FinTech (financial technology) model. Available at SSRN 3563030.
Alam, N., Gupta, L., & Zameni, A. (2019). Fintech and Islamic finance. Springer.
Amin, H., Abdul-Rahman, A.-R., & Abdul Razak, D. (2014). Theory of Islamic consumer behaviour: An empirical study of consumer behaviour of Islamic mortgage in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 5(2), 273–301.
ASRI, M. H. F. B. I. N. M. (n.d.). FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADOPTION OF E-WALLET AMONG UNISHAMS STUDENTS.
Bukowski, A. (2014). Social role of alms (zakat) in Islamic economies. Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym, 17(4), 123–131.
Chowdhury, M. A. F. (2015). Why Islamic finance is different? A short review of Islamic jurisprudential interpretation about usury, ambiguity (Gharar), gambling (Maysir) and exploitative commercial arbitrage (Talaqi alRukban). Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 3(3), 69–83.
Chrysochou, P. (2017). Consumer behavior research methods. In Consumer Perception of product risks and benefits (pp. 409–428). Springer.
Eggleston, K., Posner, E. A., & Zeckhauser, R. (2000). The design and interpretation of contracts: why complexity matters. Nw. UL Rev., 95, 91.
Ghazali, N. H. M. (2016). A Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the School-Based Assessment System: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(2), 148–157.
Ishak, N. S. B. (2020). Demand for takaful and microtakaful in Malaysia. University of Sussex.
Kamali, M. H. (2013). The Parameters of Halal and Haram in Shari’ah and the Halal industry (Vol. 23). International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).
Lăzăroiu, G., Neguriţă, O., Grecu, I., Grecu, G., & Mitran, P. C. (2020). Consumers’ decision-making process on social commerce platforms: Online trust, perceived risk, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 890.
Muhammad, R., & Lanaula, R. (2019). Challenges of Islamic Supervisory in The Islamic Financial Technology Industry. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 10(2), 311–338.
Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., Santoso, T. I., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2020). Social and management research quantitative analysis for medium sample: comparing of Lisrel, Tetrad, GSCA, Amos, SmartPLS, WarpPLS, and SPSS. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik.
Radin, T. J., Calkins, M., & Predmore, C. (2007). New Challenges to Old Problems: Building Trust In E‐marketing. Business and Society Review, 112(1), 73–98.
Saepulloh, A. (2012). Fintech-Driven Inclusion: Ethical Challenges and Digital Opportunities in Islamic Financial Transformation. OIKOS, 4(1), 1–16.
Singh, G. (2019). A review of factors affecting digital payments and adoption behaviour for mobile e-wallets. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 6(4), 89–96.
Sugiarto, I., & Disemadi, H. S. (2020). Consumers Spiritual Rights In Indonesia: A Legal Study Of Sharia Fintech Implementation In The Consumers Protection Perspective. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(3), 437–452.
Sulastyawati, D. (2020). Social Inclusion; Practical Strategies to Promote Equality of Socio-Economics In Islamic Economic Framework. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Budaya Syar’i, 7(11), 961–976.
Tung, F.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2008). Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1299–1309.
Widyastuti, U., Febrian, E., Sutisna, S., & Fitrijanti, T. (2020). Sharia compliance in sharia mutual funds: A qualitative approach.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chayra Qulaibah, Tazkia Shafia, Akhtar Akhtar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
